Diversity Executive magazine is a trademark of MediaTec Publishing Inc. All diversity-executive.com and Diversity Executive magazine content © Copyright 2011 MediaTec Publishing Inc. All Rights Reserved. It is illegal to copy, reproduce or publish any information contained on diversity-executive.com or in Diversity Executive magazine without express written permission from MediaTec Publishing Inc.
Steps to Building an Effective Diversity Measurement System, Part 1
Although interest in measuring the effects of diversity has been growing, the topic still challenges even the most sophisticated and progressive diversity departments. Diversity professionals and practitioners know they must begin to show how diversity is linked to the bottom line or they will have difficulty maintaining funding, gaining support and assessing progress.
But where do they start? Well, I will weigh in on this topic with a few thoughts in a two-part analysis. In this segment (Part 1), I will give an overview of a five-step process to consider and highlight some key background issues. Part 2 will detail each step of the process, including possible diversity metrics, formulas and suggestions.
Although measuring diversity return on investment (DROI) impact is not an exact science, there are a number of valid techniques, tools and reliable methods for translating business performance gains into tangible financial results that C-suite executives will support and embrace. Let’s get started by addressing the fundamental question: Can diversity be measured?
Before we look at what to measure, I’d like to address the concern some practitioners have about the validity of measuring diversity results. Some practitioners seem to believe that quantifiable and quality-based measures cannot be applied to the diversity implementation process or a diverse work culture. Others believe that diversity is not a business-focused activity, simply another form of affirmative action regulatory compliance. However, workforce and marketplace demographics make diversity a business and customer issue, as well as a global competitive issue.
Regardless of the events that led to this conclusion or whether this subjective position is valid or not, the fact that the position exists and that some diversity professionals and other business people support it creates major problems. In particular, it sets managing and leveraging diversity apart from the rest of the organization. While peers in other organizational areas are focusing on metrics that reflect their contribution such as sales, reduced costs, profits, income and expenses, those implementing the diversity process often limit their discussion of diversity’s contribution to increased awareness, improved feelings and increased satisfaction among work groups. Only a select few really show demonstrated, evidenced-based results of diversity’s impact on organizational performance.
As a result, diversity is not taken seriously. Few managers support it in actual practice, such as sending their workforce to be trained, using diversity in potential alternatives to solve business unit and customer problems, etc. Even fewer managers structure their workforce to leverage its richness through teaming, implementing strategic partnerships to penetrate key ethnic customer markets, and so on. We know from current organizational practice that diversity initiatives often experience less management support than other business initiatives.
I’m not suggesting that measurement is the sole solution to diversity’s acceptance into the corporate landscape. But measurement of results is a useful tool that allows the diversity practitioner to talk the language of other managers and top management. Remember, diversity activities are not conducted in a vacuum. They are part of an organizational system of processes, activities and events aimed at delivering “value,” “impact” or both.
Building a Measurement System
The creation of an effective diversity measurement system and “best” practices cannot be a mechanical modeling exercise. It must be preceded by an inspection and utilization of basic business principles. It must focus on organizational and departmental strategic thinking as well as an assessment of the desired quality of work-life. Developing the actual measures is easy compared to the amount of time that should be spent thinking about what is important to the organization’s strategic business objectives and the expectations of the diversity measurement process.
Key Steps to Building an Effective Measurement System
Creating an effective diversity measurement system and process that embodies these concepts involves at least five critical steps:
- Review the strategic business plan for needs.
- Formulate research questions.
- Design the study methodology.
- Collect and analyze data.
- Implement solutions and communicate results.
Each step in the process logically builds on the previous step, which generates an evidenced-based framework that creates a “best practice” method for proving diversity’s link to performance.
In the next segment (Part 2), we will explore each step in detail and provide suggestions for their effective use.
Edward E. Hubbard
Dr. Edward E. Hubbard is president and CEO of Hubbard & Hubbard Inc., an international organization and human performance consulting corporation that specializes in techniques for applied business performance improvement, workforce diversity measurement, instructional design and organizational development. Hubbard is an expert in organizational behavior, organizational analysis, applied performance improvement and measurement strategies, strategic planning, diversity measurement and organizational change methodologies. He holds a Practitioner Certification and Master Practitioner Certification in Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP), a Neuro-science discipline. He also earned bachelor's and master's degrees from Ohio State University and earned a Ph.D. with honors in Business Administration.
Sections
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008





